| |
499 Search Results Found |
| 1 |
Forum: Silicon Valley «»
Posted on: Tue, 20 October 2009 14:52 «»
By: Marlboro
Re: plans for single frequency electronic crossover?
S&L's ICD is a software program.
You are asking for a hardware device that allows you to do this. Doesn't the Beringer active digital crossover and equlaizer essentially do that? It costs about $300, but you can choose a slope anywhere from 6 db o...
|
| 2 |
Forum: Silicon Valley «»
Posted on: Tue, 20 October 2009 09:16 «»
By: Wayne Parham
Re: plans for single frequency electronic crossover?
Well, without getting into anything subjective I'd say that it's rare when I've seen textbook filters be the best solution. That's why I'd love to see a product like the S&L ICD designed for use as a stand-alone active crossover. You could set the ...
|
| 3 |
Forum: Silicon Valley «»
Posted on: Mon, 19 October 2009 10:34 «»
By: Wayne Parham
Re: plans for single frequency electronic crossover?
Oh, I see now. This is near and dear to my heart too.
I like bi-amplification for its obvious benefits, but I regularly have a sort of problem in that most commercial active crossovers offer pretty generic crossover points and slopes. To get a trans...
|
| 4 |
Forum: Speaker «»
Posted on: Mon, 12 October 2009 08:31 «»
By: Marlboro
Re: second array already in the works
Active is way better. And although some people complain that an analog crossover is inferior to a digital, I have no problems with my Rane AC23.
The following is my two cents, and I could easily be wrong.
I sit about 9 feet from my speakers so the 3...
|
| 5 |
Forum: Speaker «»
Posted on: Sun, 11 October 2009 22:29 «»
By: Villain3g
Re: second array already in the works
I haven't forgotten about my line array dreams. I've been weighing options like cost and complexity.
I was wondering about the length of the tweeter line. A line of 32 modified Tang Band 13-1264SA would only be about 26.5". I was considering dou...
|
| 6 |
Forum: Speaker «»
Posted on: Mon, 28 September 2009 18:05 «»
By: selahaudio
Re: Line arrays: 3 way(4 way) or two way
Well if you don't want a crossover point in the 1-2.5K range then you probably should conside another type of design. Personally I've never heard a system with the woofer running up high that made me want to build something like that. The concentric dr...
|
| 7 |
Forum: Speaker «»
Posted on: Mon, 28 September 2009 14:59 «»
By: darkmoebius2
Re: Line arrays: 3 way(4 way) or two way
I have been thinking about the sonic benefits of a woofer array to spare having to push 3"-4" drivers too low in order to use a subwoofer. But, that opens up a host of problems, itself - 1) a woofer array will place another large monolith in the ...
|
| 8 |
Forum: Speaker «»
Posted on: Mon, 28 September 2009 11:21 «»
By: Marlboro
Re: Line array differences: small vs large mids
Lets not get too excited here, Rick. I checked my message and the word "wrong" was not used, nor was there any implication of wrongness in using a larger woofer as opposed to a smaller one.
Since you apparently have brought up my line array w...
|
| 9 |
Forum: Speaker «»
Posted on: Mon, 28 September 2009 06:01 «»
By: AudioFred
Re: Last Sunday
Your question is hard to answer because you're comparing two variables: point source verus line array and active crossover versus passive. I can't answer the crossover issue, but if you were considering driver cost alone, based on my experience I would agr...
|
| 10 |
Forum: Speaker «»
Posted on: Thu, 24 September 2009 22:49 «»
By: Marlboro
Re: Widerange midwoofers, specs, and x-o pts...
Re:
"The distortion comments are most interesting. But, I wonder what the impedance circumstances of Zaph's tests were, too?"
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I don't think the impedance characteristics make any difference unless you ...
|
Posting Rules
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Get a T-Shirt!
