Home » Audio » Speaker » Active vs. Passive Crossovers (Where does this stand?)
Active vs. Passive Crossovers [message #70530] Tue, 20 December 2011 22:19 Go to next message
FloydV is currently offline  FloydV
Messages: 124
Registered: November 2011
Location: Boise, ID
Master
At AVS forum DIY speakers, several people have made statements that they no longer use passive crossover networks. Instead they use active (electronic) crossovers.

First, can someone give me a short course for dummies in Active Crossovers?

Are they really replacing passive crossovers in many applications?
Active brings to my mind something like graphic equalizers. As I remember, they were faulted for inducing unwanted distortion. Maybe times have changed.

Floyd


He who joyfully marches to music rank and file, has already earned my contempt. -- Albert Einstein
Re: Active vs. Passive Crossovers [message #70533 is a reply to message #70530] Tue, 20 December 2011 23:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18670
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)

Active crossovers are great, and offer several advantages. However, the problem is, just going active doesn't assure the DIYer of success. The crossover still has to be designed for the acoustic solution, which is not trivial. I see far too many DIYers assume that they can roll their own easily, by "dialing it in" without doing any real homework. This won't give a good result.

I have designed several loudspeakers with passive crossovers. These crossovers can be implemented actively (and in fact are during development), but the crossover I provide to the customer is passive. The truth is that 90% of my customers want a passive crossover, so that must be done, and it must be done right. That is what I provide.

For the occasional DIYer that wants to go active, I am obliged to warn them that they can't just put any old active crossover with the same crossover points in the system and expect it to work as well. It won't. The transfer function has to be matched, and that is something most general purpose active crossovers won't do. They tend to provide textbook filters only, and this just won't do.

So the long story short is, sure, active is great but only if you do the homework. It isn't a sure deal.

Here is a write-up on what things must be considered when designing a crossover. It's just one loudspeaker configuration - the matched directivity speaker aka waveguide. But it will give you an idea what things must be done for a fully-optimized loudspeaker:
Re: Active vs. Passive Crossovers [message #70580 is a reply to message #70533] Thu, 22 December 2011 20:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bill Wassilak is currently offline  Bill Wassilak
Messages: 402
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (1st Degree)
I agree with Wayne, any old active crossover will not cut it, that's why every thing's shifting to DSP x-overs rather than analog active x-overs. But using a properly designed passive x-over is a lot less expensive than going DSP and the cost of an extra amp on top of it all.
Re: Active vs. Passive Crossovers [message #70583 is a reply to message #70580] Thu, 22 December 2011 21:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
FloydV is currently offline  FloydV
Messages: 124
Registered: November 2011
Location: Boise, ID
Master
Bill, please explain analog vs. DSP xovers. I like to keep up with new tech.

Floyd


He who joyfully marches to music rank and file, has already earned my contempt. -- Albert Einstein
Re: Active vs. Passive Crossovers [message #70590 is a reply to message #70583] Fri, 23 December 2011 07:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
AudioFred is currently offline  AudioFred
Messages: 377
Registered: May 2009
Location: Houston
Illuminati (1st Degree)
FloydV wrote on Thu, 22 December 2011 21:22
Bill, please explain analog vs. DSP xovers. I like to keep up with new tech.
Floyd


You'll have to read through and around the marketing hype, but here's a summary of the functions an active DSP crossover performs. You'll need to read the intro section first, then click on the each sub heading (loudspeaker correction, room correction, etc). for the full explanation:

http://www.deqx.com/technology.php
Re: Active vs. Passive Crossovers [message #70599 is a reply to message #70590] Fri, 23 December 2011 10:21 Go to previous message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18670
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)

I would NOT suggest using a crossover that relies on a single microphone measurement to "auto-correct". What sounds good in one spot will not necessarily sound good in another spot. A good crossover, in my opinion, is one that makes the speaker sound good over a wide coverage area. This requires the speaker to be designed for this approach too, of course, but the point remains that the design goal should include optimizing the whole listening area, which then requires several microphone measurement locations. They can be measured all at once with a microphone array, or by taking several measurements and moving the microphone each time. But no single measurement using a single microphone position is adequate, not even with the most powerful processor. There just isn't enough data.

This is where I see the biggest disconnnect. Some DIYers think the ultimate solution is to throw money at the problem and get an expensive active crossover or processor. This is the wrong approach. If you want the best, it takes some homework. I don't care if it's passive or active, analog or digital. There are some really great tools out there, and the digital filters make it easier to construct compex filters and change them quickly and easily. But that's what you have to do. You have to use the tools and optimize the crossover with them. Marketing hype notwithstanding, nothing out there will do a good job auto-aligning and optimizing itself using a single microphone.

Previous Topic: Golden ratio for loudspeaker cabinets
Next Topic: Looking for new speakers
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Mar 29 08:04:08 CDT 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Smith & Larson Audio
Smith & Larson Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest