Posted by manualblock [ 69.112.43.172 ] on October 20, 2005 at 10:51:22:

In Reply to: Was DeLay convicted of something? As usual you have the facts wrong. posted by Mr Vinyl on October 20, 2005 at 08:57:06:

Did you write that post" Sure Looks Like Delay Was Innocent.?" Mr Vinyl

Replies:

• Re: See post below - Mr Vinyl 11:07:32 10/20/05 (14)
  • Re: See post below - manualblock 12:07:30 10/20/05 (13)
    • Re: See post below - Bill Martinelli 13:23:26 10/20/05 (4)
      • Re: See post below - manualblock 15:02:59 10/20/05 (3)
        • Re: See post below - Wayne Parham 18:42:46 10/20/05 (2)
          • Re: See post below - manualblock 18:57:21 10/20/05 (1)
            • Re: See post below - Wayne Parham 21:32:10 10/20/05 (0)
    • "No one said convicted; we've been talking about the charges and whether they will or will not be brought against him" - Mr Vinyl 12:22:13 10/20/05 (7)
      • Re:CUTE: BUT WRONG, AS USUAL - manualblock 13:16:36 10/20/05 (6)
        • Hmm how so? I notice you didn't respond. As usual. (NT) - Mr Vinyl 13:29:12 10/20/05 (5)
          • Re:Whats the point all you do is skirt the issue and use the caps lock - manualblock 17:23:26 10/20/05 (4)
            • I understand. Really I do. And I am very sympathetic. - Mr Vinyl 20:25:15 10/20/05 (3)
              • Re: I understand. Really I do. And I am very sympathetic. - Damir 06:29:02 10/21/05 (1)
                • Re: I understand. Really I do. And I am very sympathetic. - Mr Vinyl 08:52:47 10/21/05 (0)
              • Re:You seem to have pshycoactive drugs on the brain; hows your treatment coming? - manualblock 21:01:00 10/20/05 (0)