Posted by manualblock [ 24.191.167.32 ] on December 02, 2004 at 09:07:36:
In Reply to: Oil For Food Program Scandal posted by elektratig on December 02, 2004 at 06:13:04:
As far as they can tell so far the scandal was one of underappraised bids followed by kickbacks through Arab and Jordanian Banks in the form of vouchers that would allow the contract holders to purchase a quantity of oil from Iraq through the oil for food program. The role of the U.N. was as acting monitor to make sure the goods traded for oil would not be used for weapons and that the Iraqi's recieved fair value pricing for their oil. The sanctions committee insists it had no means to monitor the complicated business transactions that occurred. After a company bid on a contract; the regime would pick the lowest priced offer then demand a percentage to complete the deal. The percentages would arrive in the form of cash payments to the Iraqi oil ministry.
Saddams people would raise port duties to astronomical percentages citing extremely difficult transportation requirements. Sometimes one tanker would pay 60% greater fees than another depending on whether that countries representative was freindly to the regime. For the most part the Iraqi's would get cheap non-working machinery or drugs that were expired in return for vouchers. These vouchers would allow the holder to purchasse oil contracts at a low balled price then sell them on the world market for the real price. The Russians and Arab countries were some of the worst offenders. France took advantage some too but we in the U.S. seem clear on this one and the Italian Prime Minister is a hero for absolutely refusing to allow his people to capitalise on the Iraqi's misfortunes.
Thats the way I hear it. J.R.
[ Tower Forum ] [ Help ]