Posted by Adrian Mack [ 203.190.196.16 ] on December 20, 2003 at 05:49:27:
In Reply to: Re: Update posted by Wayne Parham on December 19, 2003 at 08:43:46:
Hi Wayne,
Have decided to use the 2.36L rear chamber. Unlike the 0.7L chamber, this larger one doesn't make it have that wimpy sound I was talking to you about in the emails. The large one makes it sound just fine, I can tell it makes the rolloff slope on the low end just as steep as the top end (also I measured it), but it doesn't ruin the sound of the horn at all like the small one did.
Of course, the academic reasons too, like the reduced possibility of a peak in constrained space, etc.
Well, I think its time to start work on the towers again. I hope to have them done within maybe a little over a month, or at least almost done. After getting some feedback on finishing on the Craftsmen forum, I'm going go put Tung oil on the veneer, seems like it will really make them sparkle! One person showed me a before and after shot of the cabs for his Tempest sub, looked very nice.
Adrian