Posted by wunhuanglo [ 65.6.70.16 ] on July 11, 2004 at 17:00:19:

In Reply to: Re: Oh, yeah, this is costing me serious $$$$ posted by Wayne Parham on July 11, 2004 at 16:20:59:

from the the point of view that you're giving up the dipole radiation. Even though it's large, it's still a box with reflections falling back on the rear of the cone (assuming you're in one 16" wide chase, and it's only 3-1/2" deep).

It might be closer to what I'm trying to do to just let the rear of the drivers radiate into the back yard - 1/2 the midrange energy available, but avoiding the influence on the rear of the cone.

Or then again, maybe not....

Replies:

• Re: Well, I think that's essentially a different approach - Wayne Parham 23:02:50 07/11/04 (0)
• Re: Well, I think that's essentially a different approach - manualblock 18:08:48 07/11/04 (2)
  • East, south, there's no such thing here - wunhuanglo 21:44:53 07/11/04 (1)
    • Re: East, south, there's no such thing here - manualblock 07:55:06 07/12/04 (0)