Posted by Bill Fitzmaurice [ 205.188.116.135 ] on May 14, 2004 at 13:32:46:

In Reply to: sub horn for 2240 posted by adavis464 on May 14, 2004 at 09:02:10:

Both Leach and Keele use formulas that are neither carved in stone nor necessarily the best option for a particular application. They just represent two ways of approaching horn design. Differing goals require different ways of going about it.

Replies:

• Re: Neither. - adavis464 09:29:18 05/15/04 (16)
  • There is some science, but still horns are mostly art. - Bill Fitzmaurice 14:49:47 05/15/04 (15)
    • Bill, you hit it on the head. (nt) - Ed Schilling 21:05:26 05/26/04 (2)
      • Re: Bill, you hit it on the head. (nt) - Wayne Parham 13:35:41 05/27/04 (1)
        • Re: Bill, you hit it on the head. (nt) - Ed Schilling 17:32:17 05/27/04 (0)
    • Re: There is some science, but still horns are mostly art. - adavis464 15:04:32 05/15/04 (11)
      • mcbeans prog - mike.e 06:35:12 05/16/04 (10)
        • Re: mcbeans prog - Bill Fitzmaurice 07:42:17 05/16/04 (9)
          • OOPs - mike.e 08:59:36 05/16/04 (8)
            • Re: OOPs - Wayne Parham 22:35:10 05/16/04 (7)
              • NZ has em! - mike.e 03:44:14 05/17/04 (6)
                • Re: NZ has em! - Andreas Paulsen 08:22:26 05/17/04 (2)
                  • Re: NZ has em! - mike.e 20:54:54 05/17/04 (1)
                    • Re: NZ has em! - andreas paulsen 00:49:25 05/18/04 (0)
                • Re: NZ has em! - Wayne Parham 04:15:10 05/17/04 (2)
                  • Re: NZ has em! - mike.e 04:18:46 05/17/04 (1)
                    • Re: NZ has em! - Wayne Parham 04:23:33 05/17/04 (0)