Posted by Barry [ 24.226.70.49 ] on February 21, 2008 at 19:28:59:
Any insights would be helpful.
Placed Delta 12LF in 5.1cu ft. Tuned 40Hz. Supposed f3 35Hz.
Near identical twin.
Place Delta 12LF in 5.1cu ft. Made pathway with just a little expansion from driver to near port area (but not too close).
Sounded best when tuned to 35Hz. Perhaps -3 at 30Hz.
Beginning of pathway on 13 inch width interior was set 6.25 inches back so no real compression there IMO.
Purpose of experiment was to see if lower -3 was possible by reducing Fs of driver by having a pathway inside (but open to full width prior to port.
Observations:
It sounds pretty good I think. Seems to have reduced fs of driver by 5Hz.
Seems to go lower but less punchy. Making it sound just a little less loud.
Did try tuning the one without the pathway a little lower and then it did not sound good.
No increase of volume from "inside of speaker horn" at least not with the size of port chosen.
Questions:
Should this not have produced some possible phase problems?
Maybe there is an I'm not hearing it yet?
Maybe what I hear as punchy in the one without pathway is the way is should be and the other is a phase issue on the one with the pathway?
Is there a better way to reduce fs and get a speaker to go lower in a given size box? (one that does not infringe on the patents of others)
Any input would be appreciated.
Barry
[ HighEfficiencySpeakers Forum ] [ Help ]