Posted by wunhuanglo [ 66.157.60.179 ] on August 26, 2006 at 23:03:19:
In Reply to: Re: Heavy-cones verses light-cones in basshorns posted by Wayne Parham on August 26, 2006 at 21:38:37:
What I was trying to say (apparently badly) is that a preference for heavy or light cones may be not related to mass - as you indicate the suspension, back chamber, gap flux can "equalize" performance given different levels of moving mass.
What I was trying to suggest is that the impression that a driver with a particular cone, heavy or light, is "better" may be related not to the moving mass but the inherent stiffness of the cone material or geometry - does that make any sense?
[ HighEfficiencySpeakers Forum ] [ Help ]