Posted by Earl Geddes [ 69.209.154.169 ] on March 29, 2006 at 16:23:00:

In Reply to: Re: Speaker placement posted by Wayne Parham on March 29, 2006 at 15:16:02:

I understand what you are trying to say, I just disagree with it.

"I'm saying I think probably it is worthwhile to have closer-spaced overlapping midwoofers for modal smoothing, and further spaced subs." i.e. non-Welti, or Geddes, a sort of Parham arrangement.

Below 100 Hz "integration with the mains" is irrelavent - it is insignificant. Thus, to me, your "issues" are simply not relavent. And your argument for symmetric placement is weak because it will always yield a higher spatial and frequency variance than a random or partially random placement will and there are no "integration" issues.

Replies:

• Re: Speaker placement - Wayne Parham 17:36:41 03/29/06 (4)
  • Re: Speaker placement - Earl Geddes 18:22:12 03/29/06 (3)
    • Re: Speaker placement - Wayne Parham 10:06:36 03/30/06 (2)
      • Re: Speaker placement - Earl Geddes 10:53:55 03/30/06 (1)
        • Re: Speaker placement - Wayne Parham 11:14:35 03/30/06 (0)