Posted by wunhuanglo [ 68.222.11.105 ] on April 14, 2005 at 17:21:52:

In Reply to: Re: Anyone familiar with Smith Horns? posted by spkrman57 on April 14, 2005 at 15:42:56:

That they pre-date stereo.

That they're diffraction devices intended to produce a diffuse sound field for mono-listening

That if you're the sort of person who worries about stereo "image" you'll be disappointed in them.

Replies:

• Re: I know what I've read.... - GarMan 08:48:59 04/15/05 (13)
  • Re: I know what I've read.... - Earl Geddes 19:43:59 05/06/05 (0)
  • Re: I know what I've read.... - wunhuanglo 11:48:47 04/16/05 (0)
  • Re: I know what I've read.... - Wayne Parham 11:19:49 04/16/05 (10)
    • Re: I know what I've read.... - Bob Brines 14:44:59 04/16/05 (9)
      • Re: I know what I've read.... - Earl Geddes 19:57:51 05/06/05 (0)
      • The pros of imaging - akhilesh 05:56:58 04/17/05 (5)
        • Re: The pros of imaging - Wayne Parham 13:50:03 04/17/05 (3)
          • 2 questions that would clarify our thinking... - akhilesh 23:42:58 04/17/05 (2)
            • Re: 2 questions that would clarify our thinking... - mike.e 03:24:53 04/22/05 (0)
            • Re: 2 questions that would clarify our thinking... - Wayne Parham 00:09:28 04/18/05 (0)
        • Re: The pros of imaging - Bob Brines 07:12:01 04/17/05 (0)
      • Re: I know what I've read.... - wunhuanglo 17:39:20 04/16/05 (1)
        • Directivity, the reverberent field and "imaging" - Wayne Parham 23:27:47 04/16/05 (0)