Posted by akhilesh [ 129.244.120.34 ] on February 28, 2005 at 09:14:34:

In Reply to: Re: So you are saying posted by Earl Geddes on February 25, 2005 at 15:39:48:

Earl,
Thanks, I think you did answer my question!
If the directovty of domes & cones goes down as frequency increases ( i am assuming that;s the case), then would it make sense to use cones for bass & midrange, but horns (are those wave guides?) for the higher frequencies?
Also, I was curious, how do your findings on directivty being preferable mesh with Floyd Toole's work in the 1980's, that omnidirectional sources are preferred. OR do I have the literature wrong?
-akhilesh

Replies:

• Re: So you are saying - Earl Geddes 09:49:34 02/28/05 (14)
  • I checked up Floyd Toole's work - akhilesh 12:12:13 02/28/05 (7)
    • Re: I checked up Floyd Toole's work - Earl Geddes 12:42:34 02/28/05 (6)
      • CD versus H/LD - akhilesh 15:32:02 02/28/05 (5)
        • Re: CD versus H/LD - Earl Geddes 16:52:02 02/28/05 (1)
          • Re: CD versus H/LD - akhilesh 17:23:39 02/28/05 (0)
        • Re: CD versus H/LD - Earl Geddes 15:54:48 02/28/05 (2)
          • Re: CD versus H/LD - akhilesh 16:49:44 02/28/05 (1)
            • Re: CD versus H/LD - Earl Geddes 16:58:54 02/28/05 (0)
  • Re: So you are saying - Mark Seaton 11:52:00 02/28/05 (1)
    • Re: So you are saying - Earl Geddes 12:29:48 02/28/05 (0)
  • Re: So you are saying - akhilesh 11:51:03 02/28/05 (3)
    • DI matching - Wayne Parham 14:46:37 02/28/05 (0)
    • Re: So you are saying - Earl Geddes 12:36:23 02/28/05 (1)
      • Thanks Wayne & Earl - akhilesh 15:34:12 02/28/05 (0)