Posted by mike.e [ 202.49.5.18 ] on July 11, 2004 at 02:40:57:

In Reply to: new amplifier methodology pdf(found it) posted by mike.e on July 11, 2004 at 01:47:13:

the Cheever thesis is an embarrassment to the issuing institution and a parody of the scientific method - the list of true statements about feedback and solid state amplifiers is much shorter than the list of howling errors, Cheever can’t even identify the dominant pole cap in the Hafler amp he uses

I keep trying but few seem to really be willing to look at real references rather than pass around superficially impressive looking papers that just happen to be on the web

and the AA response
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/prophead/messages/2816.html

quote:
I'm afraid I haven't got the time to read right now.

Don't bother, it was a terrible piece of work. Amazing he got that thesis passed.

• diyaudio guys opinion

Replies:

• Re: but it isnt without its critics - Wayne Parham 16:04:12 07/11/04 (4)
  • my view. - mike.e 00:42:08 07/12/04 (3)
    • Correction - mike.e 00:43:33 07/12/04 (2)
      • Re: Correction - Wayne Parham 00:50:56 07/12/04 (1)
        • 0.0001% THD - mike.e 01:08:09 07/13/04 (0)