Posted by manualblock [ 69.112.69.86 ] on April 14, 2005 at 07:15:54:
In Reply to: Re: Censorship posted by akhilesh on April 14, 2005 at 07:02:40:
AK; thats not my suggestion, those are the rules. Paragraph 2 second clause. As long as the guy fulfills this requirement he has a right to speak. I read the cancelled post and saw no other problem so naturelly assumed he needed to follow the rule as per ART in order to be heard. As well as laying to rest once and for all whether he is correct. If he shows some irritation at being challenged; maybe it is because he knows something and cannot understand why he is stonewalled. Or maybe he is not accurate and if so; we deserve to know that also.
It is a shame as he seems to have abandoned this thread so we might never know. I know this is not in the rules but there should be a system in place to provide a warning before a post is deleted.
Cencorship is invidious and as such should be exposed to the highest possible degree with the strictest standards applied. Deleting at will or capriciously is as bad as the original transgression. He should have had a chance to ammend his post if it offended you.
[ General Forum ] [ Help ]