Posted by manualblock [ 69.112.69.86 ] on October 06, 2005 at 02:37:53:

In Reply to: WTF are you talking about? posted by colinhester on October 05, 2005 at 22:54:31:

I notice you use that phrase a lot. It seems simple enough to me whats the problem? Seems to be a mis-communication on a regular basis here. This is what I want to avoid;
They ask what seems to be a rational question; wait until you respond in a rational way then instead of responding; post some irresponsible drivel and sign off wasting your time and the bandwidth. I don't know maybe you haven't noticed. It happens a lot and I prefer not to be a part of it. I reply to you here only because you seem somehow unawares that this occurs.
Why does this fascinate you anyway; it would seem you would not like this type of snipe posting eithor; so what gives?
Read the exchange with Bobby; it is clear as a bell. That is why I do not wish to waste my time.

Thats why I asked are you serious; so whats hard here?
Had you replied yes; I am serious; then we would have continued; somehow you were sidetracked and this off the wall exchange occured instead of a discussion about legal issues. The concept of legislating from the bench is a difficult topic; why start it if we will not finish it.
I don't have a bone to pick or any ego issues. I like when people disagree with me; it's a good thing as long as they are reasonable and can lighten up the tone when required.
So rather than think and write a long post that will not recieve a response I ask...are you serious before I committ to the discussion.
No one else here would have recieved this much accomodation so what is the issue; or is it some hidden agenda here? Like the Bobby snipe and run scenario.
I can't do any more explaining of my posts; it's getting tiresome now. This could have been a productive exchange instead of this whatever it is.

Replies: