| |
214 Search Results Found |
| 1 |
Forum: Speaker «»
Posted on: Wed, 23 September 2009 13:51 «»
By: jp
Re: Crossover Question about building line arrays
Hello Rick
You say :""There are some options. DBX has a DSP crossover (DriveRack PA+)for $500. Built better than the Behringer and also has parametric EQ for baffle step and response contouring. I also have access to a 3-way DSP crossover that i...
|
| 2 |
Forum: Speaker «»
Posted on: Tue, 22 September 2009 17:41 «»
By: Wendall Evans
Re: Crossover Question about building line arrays
I'm really confused now. But I'm editing this post.
OK.... I went back to the posts and realize that I have some questions from the above posts:
1. Selahaudio says: " I advise against a non-DSP crossover because they typically only have symme...
|
| 3 |
Forum: Speaker «»
Posted on: Mon, 21 September 2009 09:25 «»
By: selahaudio
Re: Crossover Question about building line arrays
Unfortunately this leaves one with the choice of a DEQX, which is as good as it gets, but costs upward for $5K new, or a Behringer DCX-2496, which costs only $300, but is mass market quality and not something I would place between a high end pre and am...
|
| 4 |
Forum: Speaker «»
Posted on: Mon, 21 September 2009 08:44 «»
By: AudioFred
Re: Crossover Question about building line arrays
Unfortunately this leaves one with the choice of a DEQX, which is as good as it gets, but costs upward for $5K new, or a Behringer DCX-2496, which costs only $300, but is mass market quality and not something I would place between a high end pre and am...
|
| 5 |
Forum: Speaker «»
Posted on: Mon, 21 September 2009 08:21 «»
By: selahaudio
Re: Crossover Question about building line arrays
Active crossovers give you more flexibility but regardless of what you use being able to measure the result is paramount to having optimal performance. If you're using tweeters with lower sensitivity (domes and some planars) the active crossover will help ...
|
| 6 |
Forum: Speaker «»
Posted on: Mon, 31 August 2009 12:57 «»
By: darkmoebius2
Re: second array already in the works
Without going to vertical ribbons, it is going to be nearly impossible to do better than that. Eric J/Marlboro was able to shave enough flange off Dayton ND20FA-6 3/4" Dome Tweeters to get comb filtering out to 15k. But, if I remember correctly, he m...
|
| 7 |
Forum: Speaker «»
Posted on: Thu, 06 August 2009 21:04 «»
By: Villain3g
First speakers - a little ambitious - curved array
When I finally decided to build a pair of speakers, I knew that I wanted to do something different. I also wanted it to be relatively "simple". The first thought was a single full range driver in a transmission line but they look like conventiona...
|
| 8 |
Forum: Pi Speakers «»
Posted on: Fri, 17 July 2009 13:35 «»
By: Wayne Parham
Loudspeaker sensitivity and boundary loading
I wondered about the sensitivity too, and how much padding I'd need to match the tweeter. What I found is you don't pad down the tweeter any more than you do with the Delta 12LF. It's acting like its more like 95dB-96dB when baffle mounted. I am anxio...
|
| 9 |
Forum: Group Build «»
Posted on: Tue, 10 March 2009 17:44 «»
By: Wayne Parham
Re: Hmmmmm
Passive equalization works by attenuating certain portions of the response curve. So it will reduce output in certain areas. Pete wanted to reduce the octave around 700Hz by a couple decibels, but nowhere else. I don't see any harm in doing that. So ...
|
| 10 |
Forum: Group Build «»
Posted on: Mon, 16 February 2009 17:00 «»
By: Wayne Parham
Re: Art Array Crossover - Further Evaluation
More on the subject in the Array Speakers forum:
Baffle step and collapsing directivity
|
Posting Rules
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Get a T-Shirt!
