I came across an article here because stereo is one phenomenon that I have not yet grasped very well. Do you agree with the argument that people are wrong in assuming that adding stereophonic sound-reproduction perfects monophonic recording?
Wayne Parham Messages: 18675 Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)
The article lists some very valid arguments, but those (and many others) have been discussed ad-nauseum for decades, quite literally. But the point that no sound source is stereo - all natural sounds are point sources - is well understood. You cannot recreate the natural imaging with stereo and, in fact, it creates problems with monaural sound because of comb filtering.
What stereo does is to allow a good illusion to be created. That's the point. Same could be said of multi-channel sound: Even five or seven channels isn't enough to create a true representation of the localization of sound sources, but it does help to create a realistic illusion.
Wayne explained it very well, but the same logic can be used with video also. That sports car that accelerated off the bridge and into that plane that helped accentuate the preceding car chase? It didn't actually happen. The producers created that illusion. That guitar solo with the echo at the end to help accentuate the whole thing? That echo didn't come out of the guitar, it came from the producers booth.
Mono is the only true recording of anything that happens in real life. Stereo creates layers to the original to make it sound better.
Posting Rules
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Get a T-Shirt!
